We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team.

Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team.

Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team.
Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation

Permalink: https://nursingpaperslayers.com/assignment-dashb…valuation-report/ ‎

Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report

Preparation

For this assessment, you may choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your benchmark evaluation.

Option 1: Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation Simulation

If you decide to use the simulation dashboard for your evaluation, review the dashboard, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics within the dashboard that are falling short of prescribed benchmarks.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER on Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Mercy Medical Center

The Mercy Medical Center prides as a top choice facility for the inhabitants of the Shakopee and Minnesota as a whole. In this health institution, patient safety is guaranteed as care providers ensure that services delivered do not harm those seeking medical attention but instead address the problem at hand. However, similar to other health institutions, no leader at Mercy Medical Center will make decisions about quality improvements without analyzing the healthcare benchmarks established by Minnesota State (Martin, 2015). Besides, the quality improvements must conform to the policies addressed by the federal government of the United States of America. As such, in order to maintain its position as a health facility for many residents in the state, the hospital administrators must ensure that the facility conforms to standards of care set by the local, state and federal laws and policies. At the Mercy Medical Center, the benchmark standards are evaluated based on the rates of readmission, medication errors, patient safety, length of stay together with the aspects of demographics and public health (Oliver, 2014). The present evaluation will focus on the Hospital CEO Dashboard to assess if Mercy Medical Center meets the standards of care established by relevant authorities.

Performance Benchmarks Set by Local, State, Federal Laws and Health Care Policies

The Joint Commission establishes performance standards related to financial and quality metrics that a care facility is required to adopt. These dashboard metrics mainly address quality and safety care to patients (Weiner, Balijepally & Tanniru, 2015). Besides, the benchmarks aim to provide procedures of documentation for serious safety events review related to given conditions and address risk management trends that care facility should embrace as health providers avail medical services to patients (Martin, 2015). However, with continuous addition and modification of quality programs by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), leaders in the health facilities find it difficult to focus on specific metrics that guarantee quality health services. This is further compounded by confusion to identify the performance benchmarks that are vital for patient care and those that can improve the financial sustainability of the care facilities.

Ideally, individual health facilities may focus on specific metrics based on their current and ideal performance. Even though some care facilities give priority to financial performance as an improvement metrics, others focus on the need to improve patient experience and quality outcomes for sustainability. However, the Joint Commission establishes essential hospital analytics to help track health care performance (Ghazisaeid et al., 2015). One of the key performance metrics listed by the commission relates to the length of stay. The metrics measure the period of admission of a patient up to the time of discharge from the care facility. The metric is tracked quarterly and the Joint Commission advocates for shorter patient stay in hospitals.

Readmission rates are another performance benchmark which keeps track of admission of patients within the same hospital or another care facility within 30 days of discharge for the same illness. According to the Joint Commission, lower rates of hospital readmission at a standard rate of 15.3 % is an indicator of quality care (Nathan & Kaplan, 2017). Mortality rates metrics provide a measure of the number of patients that die in health facility before discharge while bed utilization rate focuses on the number of hospital beds occupied at a given time. The performance metrics related to incidents comprise of the unintentional consequences of hospital procedures which include conditions such as pulmonary embolism, sepsis, hemorrhages postoperative respiratory failure among other infections. The average cost per discharge, hospital operating margin and bad debts are metrics that focus on financial aspects of care.

Option 2: Actual Dashboard From a Professional Practice Setting

If you choose an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:
•The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on. Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
•The specific type of care delivery.
•The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
•The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure that your data is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard Based on a Professional Practice Setting

If you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards that are relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation based on that setting. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be underperforming the relevant benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:
•The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.
•The specific type of care delivery.
•The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.
•The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure that your data is HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Report Requirements for Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Structure your report in such a way that it would be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need. Be sure to cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when evaluating metric performance against prescribed benchmarks. Cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis and evaluation of the challenges in meeting the benchmarks, the potential for performance improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.
In your report, be sure to:
•Evaluate dashboard metrics against the benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. ◦Which metrics are below the mandated benchmarks in the organization? Evaluate weaknesses within the entire set of benchmarks.
◦What are the local, state, or federal health care laws or policies that set these benchmarks?

•Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team. ◦What are the specific challenges or opportunities that the organization or interprofessional team might have in meeting the benchmarks? For example, consider: ◦The strategic direction of the organization.
◦The organization\’s mission.
◦Available resources: ◦Staffing.
◦Operational and capital funding.
◦Physical space.
◦Support services (any ancillary department that supports a specific care unit in the organization, such as a pharmacy, cleaning services, and dietary services).

◦Cultural diversity in the organization.
◦Cultural diversity in the community.
◦Organizational processes and procedures.

◦How might these challenges be contributing to benchmark underperformance?

•Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in the organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. ◦Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?
◦Which benchmark underperformance is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team?
◦Which benchmark affects the greatest number of patients?
◦Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff?
◦How does this underperformance affect the community the organization serves?
◦Where is the greatest opportunity for improvement in the overall quality or performance of the organization or interpersonal team—and ultimately in patient outcomes?

•Advocate for ethical action in addressing the benchmark underperformance that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. ◦At which group of stakeholders should your advocacy be directed? Which group could be expected to take the appropriate action to improve the benchmark metric?
◦What are some ethical actions that the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?
◦Why should the stakeholder group take action?

•Communicate your findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner. ◦Ensure that your report is well organized and easy to read. Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
◦Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

•Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style. ◦Did you cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when discussing the mandated benchmarks?
◦Did you cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis, evaluation, and advocacy
The NHS-FP6004 – Health Care Policy and Law Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you. Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report

Performance Benchmarking Overview: Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
This activity enables you to review a metrics dashboard and hospital fact sheet to evaluate Mercy Medical Center’s performance relative to local, state, and federal benchmarking requirements.

•Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation. Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report

Show Less

Benchmarking and Performance Measurement Tools

This article discusses best practices in benchmarking to aid organizations in creating a plan.

•Krause, J. (2017, July 28). Four questions to ask about healthcare benchmarking. Retrieved from http://www.managedhealthcareexecutive.com/benchmarks/four-questions-ask-about-healthcare-benchmarking

These resources examine performance measurement tools and benchmarking used for health care delivery.
•Behrouzi, F., Shaharoun, A. M., & Ma\’aram, A. (2014). Applications of the balanced scorecard for strategic management and performance measurement in the health sector. Australian Health Review, 38(2), 208–217.
•Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). Patient safety and quality. Retrieved from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/patient_safety_quality_dashboard/understanding_performance_metrics/core_measures.html
•National Committee for Quality Assurance. (n.d.). HEDIS and performance measurement. Retrieved from http://www.ncqa.org/hedis-quality-measurement

Performance Benchmarks Challenges and Benefits: Assignment: Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report

This study outlines key barriers to measuring and benchmarking quality of mental health care, describes innovations currently underway worldwide to mitigate barriers and offers recommendations for improving quality of mental health care.

•Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O\’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: A global perspective. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 30–38.

This resource discusses future options and challenges with respect to the Affordable Care Act provisions and requirements.
•RAND Corporation. (n.d.). The future of U.S. health care: Replace or revise the Affordable Care Act? Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/health/key-topics/health-policy/in-depth.html

This article explores hospital rankings in the United States and how they provide benefit to organizations and consumers in consideration of the Affordable Care Act.

•Huerta, T. R., Hefner, J. L., Ford, E. W., McAlearney, A. S., & Menachemi, N. (2014). Hospital website rankings in the United States: Expanding benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(2), e64.

This article discusses key practical issues in the development of performance dashboards.

•Ghazisaeidi, M., Safdari, R., Torabi, M., Mirzaee, M., Farzi, J. & Goodini, A. (2015). Development of performance dashboards in healthcare sector: Key practical issues. Acta Informatica Medica, 23(5), 317–321.

Health Care Policies, Laws, Legislation, and Metrics

This resource explains current health care policy in the United States.

•Oliver, T. R. (Ed.). (2014). Guide to U.S. health and health care policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

This article discusses the most significant reforms to the U.S. health care system as provisions and mandates in the Affordable Care Act.
•Martin, E. J. (2015). Healthcare policy legislation and administration: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 37(4), 407–411.

This resource discusses the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) current payment pathways for physicians relative to quality measures and benchmarks.

•American Medical Association. (n.d.). Quality payment program specifics. Retrieved from https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/quality-payment-program-qpp-specifics

Write a 4-6-page report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance, with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.

Introduction

In the era of health care reform, many of the laws and policies set forth by government at the local, state, and federal levels have specific performance benchmarks related to care delivery outcomes that organizations must achieve. It is critical for organizational success that the interprofessional care team is able to understand reports and dashboards that display the metrics related to performance and compliance benchmarks.

Maintaining standards and promoting quality in modern health care are crucial, not only for the care of patients, but also for the continuing success and financial viability of health care organizations. In the era of health care reform, health care leaders must understand what quality care entails and how quality in health care connects to the standards set forth by relevant federal, state, and local laws and policies. An understanding of relevant benchmarks that result from these laws and policies, and how they relate to quality care and regulatory standards, is also vitally important.

Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy-in from stakeholders.

Note: Your evaluation of dashboard metrics for this assessment is the foundation on which all subsequent assessments are based. Therefore, you must complete this assessment first.

Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.

Review the performance dashboard metrics, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Structure your report so that it will be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need, and be sure to cite the relevant health care policies or laws when evaluating metric performance against established benchmarks.

Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft report to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.

Preparation

Choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your evaluation:

Option 1: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation Simulation

Use the data presented in the Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation multimedia activity as the basis for your evaluation.

Note: The writing that you do as part of the simulation could serve as a starting point to build upon for this assessment.

Option 2: Actual Dashboard

Use an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation. If you decide to use actual dashboard metrics, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:

The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.

The specific type of care delivery.

The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.

The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure your data are Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard

If you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be underperforming the prescribed benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:

The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.

The specific type of care delivery.

The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.

The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.

Note: Ensure your data are HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.

Instructions

Note: Your evaluation of dashboard metrics for this assessment is the foundation on which all subsequent assessments are based. Therefore, you must complete this assessment first.

Write a report for a senior leader that communicates your evaluation of current organizational or interprofessional team performance with respect to prescribed benchmarks set forth by government laws and policies at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, advocate for ethical action to address benchmark underperformance and explain the potential for improving the overall quality of care and performance, as reflected on a performance dashboard.

Review the performance dashboard metrics, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks. Structure your report so that it will be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need, and be sure to cite the relevant health care policies or laws when evaluating metric performance against established benchmarks.

Requirements

The report requirements outlined below correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, be sure to note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.

Which metrics are not meeting the benchmark for the organization?

What are the local, state, or federal health care policies or laws that establish these benchmarks?

What conclusions can you draw from your evaluation?

Are there any unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where additional information could improve your evaluation?

Analyze one challenge that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team.

Consider the following examples:

Strategic direction.

Organizational mission.

Resources.

Staffing.

Financial: Operational and capital funding.

Logistical considerations: Physical space.

Support services (any ancillary department that gives support to a specific care unit in the organization, such as pharmacy, cleaning services, dietary, et cetera).

Cultural diversity in the organization and community.

Procedures and processes.

Address the following:

Why do the challenges you identified contribute, potentially, to benchmark underperformance?

What assumptions underlie your conclusions?

Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.

Focus on the benchmark you chose to target for improvement. Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?

State the benchmark underperformance that is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team.

State the benchmark that affects the greatest number of patients. Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff?

Include how this underperformance affect the community that the organization serves.

Include the greatest opportunity to improve the overall quality of care or performance of the organization or interpersonal team and, ultimately, to improve patient outcomes, as you think about the issue and the current poor benchmark outcomes.

Advocate for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance.

Who would be an appropriate group of stakeholders to act on improving your identified benchmark metric?

Why should the stakeholder group take action?

What are some ethical actions the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

Proofread your report, before you submit it, to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your evaluation and analysis.

Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to source citations and references.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 1 Example [PDF].

Report Format and Length

Format your report using APA style.

Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]. An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your report. Be sure to include:

A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.

A running head on all pages.

Appropriate section headings.

Be sure your report is 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.

Supporting Evidence

Cite 4–6 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your analysis of challenges, evaluation of potential for improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.

Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your report to your ePortfolio.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze relevant health care laws, policies, and regulations; their application; and their effects on organizations, interprofessional teams, and professional practice.

Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team.

Competency 2: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.

Advocate for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance.

Competency 3: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, to inform health care laws and policies for patients, organizations, and populations.

Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.

Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.

Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella\’s writing standards.

Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.

Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Does not evaluate dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Evaluates dashboard metrics not clearly associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies, leading to unsubstantiated conclusions about organizational performance. Evaluates dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Provides an objective, accurate evaluation of dashboard metrics associated with benchmarks set forth by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies. Clearly articulates organizational performance shortfalls and any gaps in information affecting the evaluation.
Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team. Does not identify challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team. Identifies challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team. Analyzes challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team. Analyzes challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or interprofessional team. Identifies clear implications of such challenges for the organization or team and acknowledges assumptions underlying the analysis.
Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Does not evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Conducts an evaluation of a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that misinterprets or overlooks factors that are key to a clear understanding the potential for improving overall quality or performance Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance. Provides a compelling and fully substantiated argument for the chosen benchmark’s potential impact on quality of performance.
Advocate for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance. Does not advocate for ethical action to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical action to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance. Advocates for ethical action, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, to address a benchmark underperformance. Argues effectively for recommended actions underscored by a clear and perceptive explanation of the ethical principles that guide such actions.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Does not organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Organizes content so clarity is enhanced and all ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Does not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Sources lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines virtually error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.
Introduction
NHS FPX 6004 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report

As the time is moving fast-paced, there are many professions that are working with the same pace and to get succeeded we need to be updated in medicine as well. (Harrington, 2010) So far to work in fast-paced world progress, there are some benchmarks that state or government decided to make for health care reforms. It was due to provide the best possible health care facilities to people of the state. Some of the rules in the healthcare organizations are generally for the people and many contribute to the organizational success overall. The benchmarks works as a milestone in the dashboard of metrics

It is very important to provide quality medical facilities to modern health care organizations. For this purpose organizations need to promote the quality and standards of their health care facilities. In the era of health care reforms, health care organizations must take into account what quality health care brings about when it is provided and what are the essential parts the states’ laws and policies are playing behind. It is crucial to understand that those of benchmarks that are made because of the laws and policies from the state and regulatory standards.

To maintain in the high paced industry like health care you really need to examine the states’ laws and policies and overall environment gradually and steadily. This will assist to stay aligned with the new standards of regulations in the healthcare industry. You have to make sure that all policies and laws are well cleared and understood by your staff in case to interpret various sides of the laws, ambiguity must not take place.

NHS FPX 6004 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Evaluation of Dashboard Metrics
Evaluation of Dashboard Metrics Associated with Benchmarks Proposed by State
In the evaluation process of Mercy Medical Center’s Public Health of dashboard metrics, several elements were underperformance. From the benchmarks that complied there were only a few of the measures and prescribed procedures in the Mercy Medical Center following. In the case of diabetes, there were very few patients who came in by last quarter. There have been only 17% of African American, 13% of American Indian, 6% of Asians, and 63% of white patients were there, besides the other and declined patients whose percentage are 13% and 12%. In which 38% were male and 62% were females. The highest percentage among diabetes patients in the last quarter by age was 38% of those between 45-64 and second-highest were 32% in which 65 plus age of patients were there.

In response to the diabetes patients’ treatment, Mercy Medical Center has a very few number foot exams in the last quarter of 2019 as compared to the 2018 last quarter. This rate went the same for the HgbA1c test which has 87 exams in 2018 as for 2019 the exam rate fell to 6. Although in the region of Minnesota, Mercy Medical Center has been rated as one of the top health care centers. It also has the highest rating in safe surgeries according to Shakopee Ledger, Mercy Medical Center has been in the top 20 workplaces of 2018 and 2019.

Analysis
Analyzes Challenges That Meeting Prescribed Benchmarks Can Pose For A Healthcare Organization or Interprofessional Team.
Benchmarks are those, which indicate whether an organization is moving upward or downward. The benchmarks are used often to help health care organizations develop their standards for quality care and improve the facilities they provide to satisfy their patients. So benchmarking in itself is an innovative rule that could bring out the most positive results from the organization. However, there are some of the side effects that come with this. If the health care organization is reaching the prescribed benchmarks, there would be a price that it has to pay. Following are the challenges that an organization has to face to meet the prescribed benchmarks.

NHS FPX 6004 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Identifying Peers – Competitors
When it comes to competitors, hospitals were assumed to be an exemplars but in this epoch health care organizations do have the competitions. In the pursuit of meeting the benchmarks, health care centers need competitors with whom they can benchmark against. (Gamble, 2014) In this race, the data they have to deal with must be updated since benchmarking is all about trusting the data. This is the most challenging part of meeting the benchmarks.

Evaluation of Underperformance
Evaluation of a Benchmark Underperformance in a Healthcare Organization
Although there have been a lot of matters that need to be concerned and taken into consideration. However, the main criteria in this regard are to divide the priorities whether the situation for one specific problem is prioritized. There should be considerations that specifically depend upon the region and duration of time. Though there are four quarters a year, many seasonal infections arise that need to be taken care of accordingly and they depend on the seasons. So far, the considerations play the foundational role now comes the secondary key elements.

If an organization is working with a fixed budget it is more likely to work at a steady pace but in the case of seasonal viral infection, the number of patients becomes large which can affect the benchmark underperformance. Mercy Medical Organization has multiple awards and is referred to as the best healthcare provider in 2018 and 2019 but there still has been a significant gap between diabetic treatments in this center.

Second is the financial impacts on the organization, though cost problems in hospitals are the most common ones. Nearly every health care center has to face the cost problem but how they cope with the matter is what defines their strategy to meet the benchmark. Mercy Medical Center has won the award for Health grades Outstanding Patient Experience. (Policies and Corporate Documents, 2018)

NHS FPX 6004 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Advocates for ethical action
Advocates for Ethical Action to Address a Benchmark Underperformance
To address any action that has to be taken care of needs a clear evaluation. Then the gap must be found when the gap is known it is quite easy to muddle through with that. Since the above mentioned were some of the criteria on which the underperformance can be analyzed, but on this level where the underperformance needs to be muddled through. It is a requirement in my point of view that Mercy Medical Center should have a risk management and check and balance department.

However, there are a huge number of patients or the financial inter-cost, external and internal matters should be examined by the department and a thorough report should be made to challenge all the issues.

NHS FPX 6004 Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Report
Conclusion
In the conclusion of my report, I will conclude that the health care organizations must be having a limit to follow the benchmarks, Since overemphasizing the benchmarks can lead the organization towards havoc. This can be overcome by following the benchmarks that are producing satisfying outcomes for the patients. All health care centers have different criteria for benchmarks and even the different benchmarks too, so far to meet the prescribed benchmarks, one of them has to go beyond their limits, Which in my point of view is totally unnecessary if the organization is working fine on a steady pace.

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy