We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper

Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper

 

Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper

Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper

 

Assessment of quality of life and fatigue among haemodialysis patients.

fatigue is one the most common symptoms of haemodialysis patients

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS

APA FORMAT REFERENCE NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) YEARS OLD. Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment Guideline and Rubric The goals of this assignment are to: • • • Assist students in understanding the basic process of conducting a literature review/critical appraisal. Assist students in understanding the beginning process of conducting an evidence-based practice review. Provide students with the beginnings of scientifically based knowledge on a selected procedure/topic related to nursing research. Steps of the process: • • • Select a topic with instructor’s approval. Important because some articles that have been shown to me are not research quantitative nor qualitative research studies that have come from refereed journals.Article can be quantitative or qualitative and preferably from a nursing research journal. (Please submit article to me by end of the day on Monday because I must critique it in order to be able to evaluate your critique.) Appraise the article critically using the guidelines provided in Chapter 12.This is the information provided in the syllabus.. Prepare a presentation to facilitate where a/the group member(s) discuss aspects of the critique. (See guidelines/questions below.)Power point is suggested because it may provide creativity and generate audience interest. Information to include in the report (see examples on pages 433-442) Research Problem and Purpose Why is the problem significant to nursing? • Will the study problem and purpose generate or refine knowledge for nursing practice? Literature Review • • • How current is the literature review? Does the literature review provide rationale and direction for the study? Is a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of study? Study Framework • • • Is the framework/theoretical basis presented with clarity? If a map or model is presented, is it adequate to explain the phenomenon of concern? If a proposition from a theory is tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypotheses? Research Objectives, Questions, or Hypotheses • • • Are the objectives, questions, or hypotheses expressed clearly? Are the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the research purpose and framework? Are the research objectives, questions, or hypotheses linked to concepts and relationships from the framework? Variables • • • Do the variables reflect the concepts identified in the framework? Are the variables clearly defined? Is the conceptual definition of a variable consistent with the operational definition? Method/Design .What type of research is it? Explain. How were study subjects selected? Are any subjects excluded from the study based on age, socioeconomic status, or race, without a sound rationale? If more than one group is used, do the groups appear equivalent? Are the rights of human subjects protected? Is the setting used in the study typical of clinical settings? Measurements What are the instruments that were used to measure variables and if they are scales and questionnaires did the investigator(s) clearly describe them, especially the reliability/validity of the instruments? Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment. Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper
If data were collected by observation as in qualitative studies are the phenomena to be observed clearly identified and defined? Is interrater and intrarater reliability described? Are the techniques for recording observations described? Interviews Do the interview questions address concerns expressed in the research problem? Are the interview questions relevant for the research purpose and objectives, questions, or hypotheses? Physiological Measures Are the physiological measures or instruments clearly described? Are the methods for recording data from the physiological measures clearly described? Data Collection and Analysis Is the data collection process clearly described? Is the training of data collectors clearly described and adequate? Are the results presented in an understandable way? Interpretation of Findings • • • Are findings discussed in relation to each objective, question, or hypothesis? Are the findings clinically significant? Do you believe that there are limitations that the investigator(s) did not identify? Evaluation • • • • • • • What do you determine are the major strengths/weaknesses of the study? To what populations can the findings be generalized? What questions emerge from the findings, and are these identified by the researcher? What future research can be envisioned? Can the study be replicated by other researchers? How do findings inform your practice as a nurse? When the findings are examined based on previous studies, what is now known and not known about the phenomenon under study? That is, are the findings consistent with those from previous studies? Does the author indicate the implication of the findings for practice? What are the implications of the findings for nursing practice? NURS 400 – INTRODUCTION TO NURSING RESEARCH Rubric for evaluation of research critique NURS 400 – INTRODUCTION TO NURSING RESEARCH Rubric for evaluation of research critique TITLE OF ARTICLE: Value % CRITERIA % STRUCTURE Evaluation of overall Critique Introduction (10%) Title of article How was article selected Purpose of the study Paper logically arranged to address main points of criteria for critique: (70%) Statement of the problem Hypotheses Theoretical framework Literature review Variables Operational definition(s) Sample Instruments Data collection and analysis Results Summary: (10%) 90% COMMENTS Earned Conclusions/How do findings inform nursingpractice? APA Where necessary uses APA format correctly (5%) 10% Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Article critiqued is from peer reviewed journal (5%) FINAL GRADE 100%100% 8 days ago REQUIREMENTS American Journal of Nursing Science 2015; 4(2-1): 66-73 Published online January 26, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajns) doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.s.2015040201.22 ISSN: 2328-5745 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5753 (Online) Assessment of quality of life and fatigue among haemodialysis patients Tsiamis Georgios1, Alikari Victoria1, *, Fradelos Evangelos2, Papapetrou Savvas3, Zyga Sofia1 1 Department of Nursing, University of Peloponnese, Sparta, Greece State Mental Hospital of Attica “Daphne”, Athens, Greece 3 Dr of Social Psychology, Educator of Nursing Department, University of Peloponnese, Sparta, Greece 2 Email address: tsmgeorge@gmail.com (Tsiamis G. ), vicalikari@gmail.com (Alikari V. ), evagelosfradelos@hotmail.com (Fradelos E. ), spapapetrou@yahoo.com (Papapetrou S.) , zygas@uop.gr (Zyga S.) Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Assignment. Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper
To cite this article: Tsiamis Georgios, Alikari Victoria, Fradelos Evangelos, Papapetrou Savvas, Zyga Sofia. Assessment of Quality of Life and Fatigue among Haemodialysis Patients. American Journal of Nursing Science. Special Issue: Mental Health Care: Aspects, Challenges and Perspectives. Vol. 4, No. 2-1, 2015, pp. 66-73. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.s.2015040201.22 Abstract: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of haemodialysis patients and is associated with poor quality of life. Purpose: To investigate the levels of fatigue and its correlation with quality of life of haemodialysis patients. Results: Of the 134 haemodialysis patients, the majority of patients (52,9%) seemed to have low rates of fatigue (10 Subtotal Not answer Total Educational Level Primary school Secondary school High school University Master degree Subtotal Not answer Total Marital Status Unmarried Married Divorced Widowed Total Occupation Unemployed Collar employees Civil servants Freelancers Household Retired Student Subtotal Not answer Total Frequency Percent % Valid percent Cumulative Percent 99 35 134 73,9 26,1 100,0 73,9 26,1 100,0 73,9 100,0 3 7 21 31 43 22 6 133 1 134 2,2 5,2 15,7 23,1 32,1 16,4 4,5 99,3 ,7 100,0 2,3 5,3 15,8 23,3 32,3 16,5 4,5 100,0 2,3 7,5 23,3 46,6 78,9 95,5 100,0 38 27 37 27 4 133 1 134 28,4 20,1 27,6 20,1 3,0 99,3 ,7 100,0 28,6 20,3 27,8 20,3 3,0 100,0 28,6 48,9 76,7 97,0 100,0 25 89 11 9 134 18,7 66,4 8,2 6,7 100,0 18,7 66,4 8,2 6,7 100,0 18,7 85,1 93,3 100,0 4 9 6 9 19 85 1 133 1 134 3,0 6,7 4,5 6,7 14,2 63,4 ,7 99,3 ,7 100,0 3,0 6,8 4,5 6,8 14,3 63,9 ,8 100,0 3,0 9,8 14,3 21,1 35,3 99,2 100,0 Table 2. Fatigue Assessment Scale – FAS (overall) Never Sometimes Regularly Often Always Total 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency 1 70 44 17 2 134 Percent % ,7 52,2 32,8 12,7 1,5 100,0 Never Sometimes Regularly Often Always Total 1 2 3 4 5 Not answer 0 , P < 0,05 %* 81,4 61,4 76,5 100 73,9 %** 57,6 27,3 13,1 2 100 Women Ν %* 1 100 13 18,6 17 38,6 4 23,5 – 35 26,1 %** 2,9 37,1 48,6 11,4 100 Total Ν %* 1 100 70 100 44 100 17 100 2 100 134 Cumulative Percent ,7 53,0 85,8 98,5 100,0 * column represents the evaluative category ** column represents sex Table 3. FATIGUE ASSESSMENT SCALE –FAS (Overall) Men Ν 57 27 13 2 99 Valid percent ,7 52,2 32,8 12,7 1,5 100,0 %** 0,7 52,2 32,8 12,7 1,5 100 Table 4. Distribution of patients in Fatigue Assessment Scale 10< FAS <=20 20< FAS <=30 30< FAS <=40 40< FAS <=50 Total P < 0,05 Frequency 71 43 18 2 134 Percent % 52,9 32,1 13,5 1,5 100,0 Cumulative Percent 52,9 85,0 95,5 100,0 American Journal of Nursing Science 2015; 4(2-1): 66-73 As far as the final results on the MVQOLI-15 scale , the answers to each of the individual factors are presented in 69 Table 5. Table 5. Final results of the individual factors on the scale MVQOLI-15 Overall Quality of Life Very poor Poor Moderate good Very good Total Symptom (S) Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree Agree Total Function (F) Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree Agree Total Interpersonal (IP) Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree Agree Total Well-Being (WB) Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree Agree Total Transcendent (T) Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly agree Agree Total Frequency 2 9 51 56 16 134 Percent% 1,5 6,7 38,1 41,8 11,9 100,0 Valid percent 1,5 6,7 38,1 41,8 11,9 100,0 Cumulative Percent 1,5 8,2 46,3 88,1 100,0 72 3 15 22 22 134 53,7 2,2 11,2 16,4 16,4 100,0 53,7 2,2 11,2 16,4 16,4 100,0 53,7 56,0 67,2 83,6 100,0 9 30 19 51 25 134 6,7 22,4 14,2 38,1 18,7 100,0 6,7 22,4 14,2 38,1 18,7 100,0 6,7 29,1 43,3 81,3 100,0 6 10 24 74 20 134 4,5 7,5 17,9 55,2 14,9 100,0 4,5 7,5 17,9 55,2 14,9 100,0 4,5 11,9 29,9 85,1 100,0 77 23 14 9 11 134 57,5 17,2 10,4 6,7 8,2 100,0 57,5 17,2 10,4 6,7 8,2 100,0 57,5 74,6 85,1 91,8 100,0 66 33 10 10 15 134 49,3 24,6 7,5 7,5 11,2 100,0 49,3 24,6 7,5 7,5 11,2 100,0 49,3 73,9 81,3 88,8 100,0 The patients’ mean score for the dimensions o …Critical Appraisal of a Quantitative Study Research Paper
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy