We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice.

Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice.

Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice.
NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

The Concept Analysis Assignment is due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (MT) at the end of Week 4. The guidelines are listed below as well as the guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment are located in Course Resources.

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept supported by a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Concept Analysis Assignment Course Outcomes
CO 1: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5)

CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Concept Analysis Assignment Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept that is important and useful to nursing. The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases. Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

Introduction
The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
Identifies the selected nursing
Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept.
Names the sections of the paper.
Scholarly support is required.
Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept
This section includes:

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
Literature review
This section requires:

A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
Support from nursing literature is required. Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.
Defining attributes, for this section:
A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required
Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

Antecedent and Consequence
This section requires the identification of:

1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

Empirical Referents
This section requires the identification of:

2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

Construct Cases
Explanation: hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept.

This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case.

1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
Definition
All identified attributes
Explanation: A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.

1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this cas
Explanation: Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept
Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion
This section requires:

Summarization of key information regarding:
Selected nursing concept.
Selected nursing theory.
Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice).
The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)
Preparing the Concept Analysis Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment
NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment
Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.

Adaptation
Burnout
Caring
Comfort
Compassion
Compassion fatigue
Competence
Cultural humility
Empowerment
Engagement
Health
Leadership
Meaningfulness
Modeling
Noise
Pain
Palliative care
Quality of life
Resilience
Self-care
Sensory overload
Situational awareness
Rubric

W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinition/Explanation of Selected Concept
This section includes: • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented. References from nursing literature are required.

25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.

10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
This section requires: • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

35.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

31.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

28.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

13.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes
For this section: • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. References from nursing literature are required.

25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.

22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.

10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedents & Consequences
This section requires the identification of: • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. References from nursing literature are required.

25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmpirical Referents
This section requires the identification of: • 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. References from nursing literature are required.

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConstruct Cases
This section requires: 1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition, • All identified attributes, • Antecedent, • Consequence, and • Empirical referent or Measurement Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept
This section requires: • The identification of 2 (two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are: o Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept. o Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept Applies information from selected nursing theory.

30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required

24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
This section requires: • Summarization of key information regarding: • Selected nursing concept, • Selected nursing theory, and • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications
A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. Paper meets length requirements of 8 to 10 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

20.0 pts
This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

18.0 pts
This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

16.0 pts
This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

8.0 pts
This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

0.0 pts
This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format (6th edition)
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. One deduction for each type of APA style error

10.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present

9.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present

8.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present

4.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present

0.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

5.0 pts
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

4.0 pts
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.

3.0 pts
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

2.0 pts
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

0.0 pts
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.

5.0 pts
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

4.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

3.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

2.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

5.0 pts
Total Points: 250.0
PreviousNext

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy