Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies.
NR 505 Week 2 Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process

Your Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Assignment is due this week. You can find the guidelines listed below as well as a copy of the guidelines and rubric are also located in the Documents section of Course Resources.

Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue work on a previously identified area or phenomenon of interest related to their MSN specialty track. Week Two’s assignment builds upon the identified area of interest by developing an overview of the evidence-based practice (EBP) project and the PICOT/PICo question. This assignment initiates the evidence-based practice proposal that is continued throughout the entire course with each assignment adding components of the research process.

Course Outcomes
This Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO#1 Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. PO 1

CO#2 Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. PO 2, 5

CO#4 Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. PO 1, 2, 3, 5

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Two

Total Points Possible: 150 points

Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process Requirements

Description of the Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process Assignment
This assignment builds on the identification of a nursing concern from NR 500 and the application of a nursing theory to the selected concern from NR 501. For this course, the selected concern and nursing theory then serve as a foundation to the identification of PICOT/PICo. Identification of the literature search strategy is also required.

Criteria for Content

Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project: This section provides a foundation to the MSN EBP scholarly project. It should contain the following elements:
Explain the relationship between research and evidenced-based practice (EBP)
Distinguish how EBP is different from research
Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing
Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus
Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting
Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved: This section provides a comprehensive discussion of the selected nursing concern. It should contain the following elements:
Explain the selected nursing concern in detail
Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting
Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern
Identify the consequences of the selected concern
Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern
Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal
PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process: This section identifies the PICOT/PICo question that will used for this EBP proposal. The literature search parameters will also be identified. It should contain the following elements:
Identify the question in correct format with all required elements
PICOT for quantitative research approach
PICo for qualitative research approach
Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting
Discuss the purpose of conducting a literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal
Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:
The specific library databases used
The key search terms and phrases used
The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used
Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal
Theoretical Framework: This section presents the theoretical framework that will used in this EBP project. It should contain the following section:
Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal
Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applied to this EBP proposal
Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 5, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6thedition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
A minimum of 6(six) appropriate research-based scholarly references must be used. Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOTbe used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.
Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
FNPs Role in Reducing Falls in Long-term Care Facilities

Research is typically conducted to explore and discover new knowledge or to validate existing information about a specific subject. Specifically, nursing research is form of scientific investigation meant to explore and explain a variety of clinical experiences,

NR 505 Week 2 Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
NR 505 Week 2 Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process

outcomes, and phenomena that is vital to the scientific and professional foundation of nursing (Baker, 2016). The goal of nursing research is to drive the practice to meet a high level of patient care outcomes (Baker, 2016). Nursing research also sets out to identify the links or gaps between published research and current clinical practice (Baker, 2016). Research is based on collected opinions, but it is also built upon a framework of scientific inquiry to avoid bias as much as possible (Baker, 2016). In contrast, evidence-based practice (EBP) is founded on collected scientific and medical research, but it is also an expert opinion built on professional, clinical, and patient experiences. The goal of EBP is to translate or utilize current knowledge, research, and other pertinent medical data into everyday clinical practice to provide the best care possible for patients. FNPs and other nurses who utilize this approach should study recent healthcare research to determine the best course of patient care and treatment (Baker, 2016).

Evidence-based practice and research take different approaches to identifying quality nursing data and expert/clinical opinions. The difference between EBP and research is that FNPs can use evidence-based practice to make connections between conducted research and clinical experiences (Echevarria, Teegarden, & Kling, 2017). Evidence-based practice is not focused on research first but about employing traditional or alternative care and treatment methods then sharing that information in a published format (Echevarria et al., 2017). EBP urges nurses to consider the “why” and “how” behind existing nursing methods and applications in an effort to improve clinical outcomes (Echevarria et al., 2017). Lastly, EBP seeks to challenge and add to the traditional body of nursing knowledge.

The contribution of EBP to professional nursing is vast. Since its professional inception, nursing has evolved the way nurses provide optimal patient care and the way in which they are educated. Over the past decade, EBP has been garnering more attention from nursing professionals and has slowly emerged as an excellent standard by which to provide clinical care (Mick, 2017). Evidence-based practice has transitioned to the classroom setting, influencing undergraduate and graduate nursing programs (Mick, 2017). EBP nursing coursework increases nursing students’ overall knowledge base as it teaches them the importance of professional accountability and fosters critical thinking skills (Stevens, 2013). EBP also makes an invaluable contribution to the field of nursing because it considers the nurses role in nurturing interpersonal relationships between patients and nurses (Stevens, 2013). EBP shows the relevance of respecting and seeking better understanding of how patients’ clinical, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds relate to scientific research and suggested treatments (Mick, 2017). Incorporating EBP nursing concepts and findings throughout a nurse’s education and clinical experiences develops decision-making skills as nurses are better able to adapt to situations, utilize informatics, and work together in collaborative teams (Stevens, 2013). When EBP narratives are shared in the classroom, utilized to create health and nursing legislation, and accepted by nursing organizations and theorists, nurses gain a greater sense of confidence and pride in their work. Furthermore, EBP has led nurses to become more interested and invested in nursing research (Stevens, 2013). Additionally, when relevant EBP is used in a clinical setting, nurses have a working approach to managing complications associated with illness or disease. This patient centered approach helps lower costs of care as it eliminates unnecessary costs associated with testing and treatment plans (Stevens, 2013)…..CONT’D

Rubric FOR Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process

Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview of Selected Evidence-based Practice Project
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP) • Distinguish how EBP is different from research • Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing • Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus • Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: • Explain the selected nursing concern in detail • Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting • Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern • Identify the consequences of the selected concern • Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern • Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Identify the question in correct format with all required elements o PICOT for quantitative research approach o PICo for qualitative research approach • Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting • Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal • Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including: o The specific library databases used o The key search terms and phrases used o The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used o Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following: • Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal • Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications
10.0 pts
This section included all of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

9.0 pts
This section included three of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

8.0 pts
This section included only two of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

4.0 pts
This section included only one of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

0.0 pts
This section included none of the following: • Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page. • Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references • Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. • All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
25.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present

22.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present

20.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA errors were are present

10.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA errors were present

0.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, body of paper (including margins, headings, font, etc.), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
10.0 pts
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

9.0 pts
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

8.0 pts
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

4.0 pts
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

0.0 pts
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
15.0 pts
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

13.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

12.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

6.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

15.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0
PreviousNext