Summer 2018 NURS 4345 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Healthcare Information Technology PODCAST EVALUATION FORM Student . Healthcare Information Technology evaluationName:_________________________________________________________________ Course:_______________________________________________________________________ Instructor:_____________________________________________________________________ Web Source Title:_______________________________________________________________ Web Source URL:_______________________________________________________________ Date Visited Web Source:_________________________________________________________ Describe the main points presented in the Podcast. Discussion of main points demonstrates detail, depth, creativity and critical thinking. Podcasts on diagnosis, disease processes, nursing techniques, treatments or procedures are not appropriate for this assignment. Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 200 words using APA Format) Reference: Adapted from Harvard College Revised 06/21/2017 cs/rp Summer 2018 NURS 4345 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Healthcare Information Technology The evaluation form utilizes a 1 (Low) to 5 (High) scale. Please place a check mark in the column that is based on your perception of the Web source. There should only be one mark for each of the six areas. For example, if you assigned a value of “5” for each of the six criteria the total score would be 30. PODCAST APPRAISAL FORM CRITERIA 1. AUTHORITY: •Author(s) name documented. •Author(s) credentials and experience documented. •Author(s) contact information documented. •URL indicates reliable and reputable agency. 1 2 3 4 5 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format). CRITERIA 2. OBJECTIVITY: •Purpose of Web source clearly documented. •Intended audience (Lay persons or professional?) identified. •Information presented is based on the evidence or is it opinion? •Web source is free of bias. 1 2 3 4 5 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format). CRITERIA 3. ACCURACY AND CURRENCY: •Facts or evidence have been well-researched. •Information correlates with other related sites or publications. •Creation date and revision dates are documented. •Information is evidence-based and focuses on best practices. 1 2 3 4 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format) Revised 06/21/2017 cs/rp 5 Summer 2018 NURS 4345 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Healthcare Information Technology CRITERIA 4. USABILITY AND PRESENTATION: •Web source is logically organized and easy to maneuver through. •Content is easily readable by intended audience. •Audio is sufficient to clearly hear presentation. •No grammar, spelling or punctuation errors in text. •Spoken word is clearly articulated and language appropriate. Healthcare Information Technology evaluation

*Images, pictures, and graphics match spoken word and text. *Timing of images, pictures and graphics correlate with audio. 1 2 3 4 5 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format) CRITERIA 5. ENGAGEMENT: •Clearly communicated content and concepts. •Utilized a variety of teaching strategies for adult learners. •Encouraged me to ask questions of myself (Self-reflection). •Encouraged me to have dialogue with student peers and nurses in practice. 1 2 3 4 5 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format) CRITERIA 6. CRITICAL THINKING: •Promoted analysis of integrity of this Web source and others in the future. •Promoted clinical reasoning through integration of technology and content. •Encouraged application of Web sources to nursing practice. 1 2 3 4 Discussion of the criteria should be written in a well-developed, concise and succinct paragraph (Minimum of 50 words using APA format) TOTAL PODCAST EVALUATION TOTAL POINTS Total possible points is 30. Rating based on the total possible points: 27-30: Excellent 24-26: Good 21-23: Fair 18-20: Poor < 18: Very poor Student Rating________ Revised 06/21/2017 cs/rp 5 Summer 2018 NURS 4345 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Healthcare Information Technology Please describe in detail your personal assessment of the Podcast by answering the following questions. The response to the evaluation questions should be written in welldeveloped, concise and succinct paragraphs. Responses should be free from spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure errors. Each response is a minimum of 250 words excluding references. APA format should be used when responding to the questions. Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast discussed. More than three references are recommended for a higher grade for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 1. Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other healthcare providers or patients? Why or why not? 2. How would you integrate the Podcast information into your own nursing practice? Describe at least two ways that the Podcast is relevant to your nursing practice. 3. List of References Revised 06/21/2017 cs/rp Summer 2018 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS__________________________________________________________________________________________________ Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Criteria Proficient Competent Content provides information on all required criteria items Content is missing one of the required criteria items Content is missing two or three of the required criteria items Content is missing four or five of the required criteria items Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria Points Described the main points presented in the Podcast. Discussion of main points demonstrate detail, depth, creativity and critical thinking with a minimum of 200 words. 5 Points Content describes the main points of the Podcast in detail, and depth demonstrating creativity and critical thinking. 3 Points Content describes the main points of the Podcast. 2 Points Content describes minimal information on the main points of the Podcast. 1 Points Content describes limited information on the main points of the Podcast. OR Did not meet minimum word count. 0 Points The assignment was not posted. Points Evaluated each Criteria on the Appraisal Form using the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 10 Points Evaluated six Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 8 Points Evaluated five Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 7 Points Evaluated four Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 6 Points Evaluated three Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 0 Points Evaluated one or two Criteria on the 1-5 Likert scale Evaluate each of the six criteria in a minimum of 50 words excluding references 1. Authority 2. Objectivity 3. Accuracy and currency 4. Usability and presentation 5. Engagement 6. Critical Thinking Described each of the criteria within minimum word count Described five of the six criteria within minimum word Described four of the six criteria within minimum word count Described three of the six criteria OR Did not meet minimum word count on each criteria Described one or two of the six criteria OR Assignment not posted A Podcast that isn’t directly related to Health Care Technology and focuses on nursing diagnosis, disease processes, nursing treatments, or nursing interventions will have 10 points deducted from the overall score. Completed required items on Podcast Evaluation Form: Student name Course Instructor Podcast title Podcast URL Creator and/or publisher of podcast Date visited Podcast Points Expert 15 Points . 13 Points 11 Points Substantial Areas for Improvement 9 Points Unsatisfactory 0 Points Summer 2018 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Question #1: Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other healthcare providers or patients? Why or why not? Please be specific with sufficient detail and references to support your response. NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Response is written in welldeveloped paragraph describing in detail the student’s personal recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response describes the student’s personal recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response provides minimal description of the student’s recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response did not meet criteria as evidenced by +providing limited description of the student’s recommendation of the Podcast. OR Did not meet minimum word count Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria 25 Response describes in detail two or more ways that the Podcast is relevant to the students nursing practice within minimal word count 20 Response describes two ways the Podcast is relevant to the students nursing practice within minimal word count 18 Response provides minimal information on two ways the Podcast is relevant to the student’s nursing practice within minimal word count 15 Response did not meet criteria as evidenced by the following: +Provides information on one way the Podcast is relevant to the student’s nursing practice. OR Did not meet minimum word count 0 Points Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria 25 Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure 20 One spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure error 18 Two spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure errors 15 Three spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure Errors 0 Points Four or more spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure errors 10 Points Utilized more than three references 8 Points Utilized three references APA format correct APA format correct 7 Points Utilized three references but the requirements of the references was not met as evidenced by: +Utilized the discussed Podcast as a required reference OR +One APA error 6 Points Requirement for the references was not met as evidenced by: +Utilized one or two references OR +Two APA errors OR +Cited reference(s) are not peerreviewed, scholarly or professional 0 Points No references cited OR Three or more APA errors 10 Points 9 Points 7 Points 6 Points 0 Points Minimum of 250 words excluding references Points Question #2: How would you integrate the Podcast information into your own nursing practice? Please be specific with sufficient detail and references to support your response. Minimum 250 words excluding references Points Scholarly Writing Evaluation Form should be free from spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure errors Points APA/References Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast discussed. APA format correct. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Grade PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Summer 2018 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised: 8/1/2013; 12/29/2014; 08/2016 12/2016; 3/27cs; 7/2017 cs/rp Podcast Evaluation Students will gain experience searching the Web for Podcasts on Healthcare Information Technology. Students will evaluate the quality of the design of and information provided by the Podcast. Podcasts on diagnosis, disease processes, nursing techniques, treatments or procedures are not appropriate for this assignment. A Podcast that isn’t directly related to Health Care Technology and focuses on nursing diagnosis, disease processes, nursing treatments are not appropriate. Section I Students will use the Podcast Evaluation Form to evaluate the integrity of the Podcast. The first page of the form is information about the Web source. Describe the main points presented in the Podcast within a minimum 200 word count using APA format. Discussion of main points demonstrates detail, depth, creativity and critical thinking. Section II Students will evaluate six different criteria related to the Podcast. Please provide a narrative description for each of the six criteria within a minimum 50 word count for each criteria using APA format. These criteria include: (1) Authority (2) Objectivity (3) Accuracy and Currency (4) Usability and Presentation (5) Engagement (6) Critical Thinking The evaluation form utilizes a 1 (Low) to 5 (High) scale. Please place a check mark in the column that is based on your perception of the Web source. There should only be one mark for each of the six areas. For example, if you assigned a value of “5” for each of the six criteria the total score would be 30. Section III Please describe in detail your personal assessment of the Podcast by answering the following questions. The response to the evaluation questions should be written in well-developed, concise and succinct paragraphs. Each response is a minimum of 250 words excluding references using APA format Please be specific with sufficient detail and references to support your response. 1. Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other healthcare providers or patients? Why or why not? 2. How would you integrate the Podcast information into your own nursing practice? Describe at least two ways that the Podcast is relevant to your nursing practice. Section IV Scholarly Writing Writing style allows for clear communication through logical presentation of ideas. Responses should be free from spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure errors. References Three references are required for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast. More than three references are recommended for a higher grade for the Podcast Evaluation excluding the Podcast. References should be correctly cited and listed in APA format. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Submit the completed Evaluation Form to the Evaluation Form assignment icon. Summer 2018 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Criteria Proficient Competent Content provides information on all required criteria items Content is missing one of the required criteria items Content is missing two or three of the required criteria items Content is missing four or five of the required criteria items Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria Points Described the main points presented in the Podcast. Discussion of main points demonstrate detail, depth, creativity and critical thinking with a minimum of 200 words. 5 Points Content describes the main points of the Podcast in detail, and depth demonstrating creativity and critical thinking. 3 Points Content describes the main points of the Podcast. 2 Points Content describes minimal information on the main points of the Podcast. 1 Points Content describes limited information on the main points of the Podcast. OR Did not meet minimum word count. 0 Points The assignment was not posted. Points Evaluated each Criteria on the Appraisal Form using the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 10 Points Evaluated six Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 8 Points Evaluated five Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 7 Points Evaluated four Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 6 Points Evaluated three Criteria on the 1 to 5 Likert scale. 0 Points Evaluated one or two Criteria on the 1-5 Likert scale Evaluate each of the six criteria in a minimum of 50 words excluding references 1. Authority 2. Objectivity 3. Accuracy and currency 4. Usability and presentation 5. Engagement 6. Critical Thinking Described each of the criteria within minimum word count Described five of the six criteria within minimum word Described four of the six criteria within minimum word count Described three of the six criteria OR Did not meet minimum word count on each criteria Described one or two of the six criteria OR Assignment not posted A Podcast that isn’t directly related to Health Care Technology and focuses on nursing diagnosis, disease processes, nursing treatments, or nursing interventions will have 10 points deducted from the overall score. Completed required items on Podcast Evaluation Form: Student name Course Instructor Podcast title Podcast URL Creator and/or publisher of podcast Date visited Podcast Points Expert 15 Points .

13 Points 11 Points Substantial Areas for Improvement 9 Points Unsatisfactory 0 Points Summer 2018 Podcast Evaluation Grading Rubric Question #1: Would you recommend this Podcast to your peers, other healthcare providers or patients? Why or why not? Please be specific with sufficient detail and references to support your response. NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Response is written in welldeveloped paragraph describing in detail the student’s personal recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response describes the student’s personal recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response provides minimal description of the student’s recommendation of the Podcast within minimal word count Response did not meet criteria as evidenced by +providing limited description of the student’s recommendation of the Podcast. OR Did not meet minimum word count Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria 25 Response describes in detail two or more ways that the Podcast is relevant to the students nursing practice within minimal word count 20 Response describes two ways the Podcast is relevant to the students nursing practice within minimal word count 18 Response provides minimal information on two ways the Podcast is relevant to the student’s nursing practice within minimal word count 15 Response did not meet criteria as evidenced by the following: +Provides information on one way the Podcast is relevant to the student’s nursing practice. OR Did not meet minimum word count 0 Points Assignment not posted OR Does not meet the requirements of the criteria 25 Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure 20 One spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure error 18 Two spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure errors 15 Three spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure Errors 0 Points Four or more spelling, grammar, punctuation or sentence structure errors 10 Points Utilized more than three references 8 Points Utilized three references APA format correct APA format correct 7 Points Utilized three references but the requirements of the references was not met as evidenced by: +Utilized the discussed Podcast as a required reference OR +One APA error 6 Points Requirement for the references was not met as evidenced by: +Utilized one or two references OR +Two APA errors OR +Cited reference(s) are not peerreviewed, scholarly or professional 0 Points No references cited OR Three or more APA errors 10 Points 9 Points 7 Points 6 Poi …