We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

 

Excellent 90%–100% Good 80%–89% Fair 70%–79% Poor 0%–69%
The cover letter is:• Presented and formatted in professional business manner

• Addressed properly

• Clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes an introduction, body, and conclusion

• Written in a professional tone

Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes a well-written and compelling introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes an appropriate introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Presentation and formatting are somewhat uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is addressed adequately but may be missing one or more components. Response contains an introduction, body, and conclusion but may be somewhat vague or unclear. May not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not uniformly professional. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Presentation and formatting are uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is not addressed appropriately. Response may be missing an introduction, body, and/or conclusion. Does not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not appropriate or response is missing. Feedback:
The Resume is clear, concise and well organized and includes:• Name, location (city/town and state), business phone number, and email address (centered at top of resume)

• Objective: 2–3 sentences describing your goal/objective for employment

• Certifications & licenses

• Education

• Professional experience

• Honors/Awards

• References

Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear and well-written objective for employment. Response clearly, accurately, and concisely describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear objective for employment. Response clearly and accurately describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Response may contain minor errors in presentation and formatting. Response is addressed but may be missing a component. Response contains an objective for employment. Response describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards, as applicable, but may be somewhat unclear or disorganized. Response provides two references. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Response contains errors in presentation and formatting. Response is not addressed. Response does not contain an objective for employment. Response is missing two or more of the following components: certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides one or no references. Feedback:
The Portfolio is clear, concise and well organized and includes:• Personal philosophy statement

• Personal goals (short term and long term)

• Self-assessment

Points: Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response contains a well-articulated philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear and well-written personal goals and self-assessment. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response contains a clear philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear personal goals and self-assessment. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or is somewhat inappropriate for business. Response contains a somewhat general philosophy statement. Personal goals and self-assessment are somewhat vague or unclear. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or are inappropriate for business. Several or all components are vague, inaccurate, or missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

The cover letter is:

• Presented and formatted in professional business manner

• Addressed properly

• Clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes an introduction, body, and conclusion

• Written in a professional tone

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes a well-written and compelling introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response is clear and concise (no more than one page) and includes an appropriate introduction, body, and conclusion. Response uses a professional tone. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Presentation and formatting are somewhat uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is addressed adequately but may be missing one or more components. Response contains an introduction, body, and conclusion but may be somewhat vague or unclear. May not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not uniformly professional. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Presentation and formatting are uneven or inappropriate for the context. Response is not addressed appropriately. Response may be missing an introduction, body, and/or conclusion. Does not adhere to the one-page limit. Tone is not appropriate or response is missing. Feedback:

The Resume is clear, concise and well organized and includes:

• Name, location (city/town and state), business phone number, and email address (centered at top of resume)

• Objective: 2–3 sentences describing your goal/objective for employment

• Certifications & licenses

• Education

• Professional experience

• Honors/Awards

• References

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear and well-written objective for employment. Response clearly, accurately, and concisely describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response is addressed properly. Response contains a clear objective for employment. Response clearly and accurately describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides three references. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Response may contain minor errors in presentation and formatting. Response is addressed but may be missing a component. Response contains an objective for employment. Response describes certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards, as applicable, but may be somewhat unclear or disorganized. Response provides two references. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Response contains errors in presentation and formatting. Response is not addressed. Response does not contain an objective for employment. Response is missing two or more of the following components: certifications, licenses, education, professional experience, and honors/awards. Response provides one or no references. Feedback:

The Portfolio is clear, concise and well organized and includes:

• Personal philosophy statement

• Personal goals (short term and long term)

• Self-assessment

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Response is presented and formatted in a very clear and professional business manner. Response contains a well-articulated philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear and well-written personal goals and self-assessment. Good 80%–89% 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Response is presented and formatted in a clear and professional business manner. Response contains a clear philosophy statement that reflects synthesis of concepts. Response contains clear personal goals and self-assessment. Fair 70%–79% 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or is somewhat inappropriate for business. Response contains a somewhat general philosophy statement. Personal goals and self-assessment are somewhat vague or unclear. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Presentation and formatting detracts from the content and/or are inappropriate for business. Several or all components are vague, inaccurate, or missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy