On what basis are specific parties or groups of parties selected for direct involvement in a research effort?
Assignment: Application ethical legal concerns

Permalink: https://nursingpaperslayers.com/assignment-appli…l-legal-concerns/

Assignment: Application of ethical and legal concerns

Case Vignette 1:You are a supervisor in your thirties. You and your new supervisee have a great deal in common. It’s become routine to hold your supervision sessions in the local Starbucks. When the work is done, you can relax and enjoy each others’ company. You’re thinking of sharing a room at the upcoming conference on family therapy in Boston. Identify the ethical and legal concerns that apply to this situation.

Case Vignette 2:You are a male supervisor, African American, in your mid-thirties. Your supervisee is a female, Caucasian, and in her late forties. You are supervising the family therapy of a family whose parents are first generation from Columbia. Identify the ethical and legal concerns that apply to this situation. In the case analysis, please include the following information:

Description of at least 3 ethical and/or legal issues in the vignette
Identification of relevant ethical codes
Explanation of 3 courses of action to resolve the issue
Description of the decision-making process for each course of action
Assessment of option that best upholds the ethical standards of the profession
The paper should be 5 to 6 pages, and include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.

The principle of justice suggests that the benefits and burdens associated with R&D should be fairly distributed. To paraphrase the Belmont report, injustice occurs if some benefit to which a person is entitled is denied improperly or when some burden is imposed unduly. Some considerations include the following:

• On what basis are specific parties or groups of parties selected for direct involvement in a research effort? For example, why is one group rather than another chosen to be the pool of research subjects? Why is one geographical location rather than another the choice for situating a potentially dangerous research facility?

• How and to what extent, if at all, do national security considerations demand that certain groups (e.g., warfighters) accept an exceptional or a higher level of risk than that accepted by or imposed on other groups (e.g., civilians)?

• How and to what extent, if at all, should new knowledge derived