We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

 PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

 PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

 

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Responses Points: Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) Responses are on topic and may have some depth. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) Responses may not be on topic and lack depth. No credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing. Feedback:
Participation Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least 2 days. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in 1 day. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Responses–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) Responses exhibit synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Responses demonstrate synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are thoroughly addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) Responses exhibit critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responses provide clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by 2 or more credible sources. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are addressed. Responses are effectively written in standard, edited English. Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) Responses are on topic and may have some depth. Responses may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and only one or no credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Presenters’ prompts/questions posed in the case presentations are inadequately addressed. Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%) Responses may not be on topic and lack depth. No credible sources are cited. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to colleagues’ prompts/questions are missing. Feedback:

Participation–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Responses are carried out over multiple days between Days 4 and 7. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Meets requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, over at least 2 days. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Participants respond at least twice to each colleague who presented this week, but responses may occur all in 1 day. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) Does not meet requirements for participation by responding at least twice to each colleague who presented this week. Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: PRAC_6675_Week7_Discussion_Participant_Rubric

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy