We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan

Assessment Description

In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.
Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.
Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.
Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.
Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines

NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan
NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan

for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Resources

Collapse All

Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative

Read “Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative,” by Schirm, Banz, Swartz, and Richmo

… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0897189717301118#s0030

Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice

Read “Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice,” by Kamper, from Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical The

… Read More

https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0702

Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences

Read “Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences,” by Zbrog (2021), located on t

… Read More

https://www.mhaonline.com/faq/clinical-vs-statistical-significance

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

View Resource

Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters

Read “Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement/Innovation Posters” (2015), from AORN Journal.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109809571&site=eds-live&scope=site

A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing

Read “A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing,” by Stannard, from Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan
… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S1089947219303181

Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What Is Taught and How It I s Measured

Read “Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What is Taught and How it is Measured,” by

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/scholarly-journals/evidence-based-practice-educational-intervention/docview/2089734479/se-2?accountid=7374

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice

Read Chapter 4 and review Chapter 3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.

View Resource

Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice

Review Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.

View Resource

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric

Collapse All

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

5: Excellent
14.4 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

4: Good
13.25 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory
12.67 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points

Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.

Data Collection Tools

12 points

Criteria Description

Data Collection Tools

5: Excellent
12 points

A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.

4: Good
11.04 points

A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory
10.56 points

A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points

A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

A data collection tool is not discussed.

Statistical Test for Project

12 points

Criteria Description

Statistical Test for Project

5: Excellent
12 points

A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.

4: Good
11.04 points

A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory
10.56 points

A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points

A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

A statistical test is omitted.

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

12 points

Criteria Description

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

5: Excellent
12 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.

4: Good
11.04 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory
10.56 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

14.4 points

Criteria Description

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

5: Excellent
14.4 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

4: Good
13.25 points

Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.

3: Satisfactory
12.67 points

General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
11.52 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

13.2 points

Criteria Description

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

5: Excellent
13.2 points

Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.

4: Good
12.14 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory
11.62 points

General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
10.56 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.

Required Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5: Excellent
6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

4: Good
5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sources are not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

8.4 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5: Excellent
8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4: Good
7.73 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3: Satisfactory
7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

9.6 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5: Excellent
9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4: Good
8.83 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3: Satisfactory
8.45 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

6 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5: Excellent
6 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4: Good
5.52 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

6 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5: Excellent
6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

4: Good
5.52 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

All format elements are correct.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

6 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5: Excellent
6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4: Good
5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3: Satisfactory
5.28 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

1: Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sources are not documented.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy