Research is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature.
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling

With the focus on qualitative design and sampling, this is a great opportunity to compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research approaches. For each of the following areas, apply information that considers one advantage and one disadvantage regarding:
control over study conditions with the quantitative research approach;
control over study conditions with the qualitative research approach;
extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach; and
extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach.
Be sure to include scholarly references to support your information FOR NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling.

NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling SAMPLE
Research is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature. Quantitative research employs the use of numbers and accuracy while qualitative research focuses on lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). There are some advantages and disadvantages to both forms of research queries. The common goal of both is to conclude with positive, well-designed results that promotes change or introduces an intervention that is accurate and useful.

Control over Study Conditions Research Approach: Advantage

Quantitative

One advantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is the way the data is collected. One form of research method that is used is the use of surveys for collection of data. With the use of surveys, data can be analyzed in an easy and fast manner, therefore consumption of time is less. The quantitative research approach consists of less time consumption, which allows a large amount of data to be collected.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling

Qualitative

Qualitative research allows gathering of more in-depth data. Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows gaining a better

NR 505 Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Design and Sampling
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Design and Sampling

understanding of collected data, thus allowing a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).

Control over Study Conditions Qualitative Research Approach: Disadvantage

Quantitative

A disadvantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is that research is less in-depth. The observation of collected data and pertinent information can be overlooked with this form of research. The results can become vague and useless to the research. This may cause a waste of time and resources, if the data is not reviewed for the intended outcome and accuracy.

Qualitative

A disadvantage of qualitative is its low credibility due to an inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). For example, the inability to give percentages of an unwarranted event’s chance of reoccurrence in the future.

NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling SAMPLE RESPONSE
I was very impressed by your post on comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Your discussion board post was clear and concise in regard to control over sample conditions for both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The way that you broke your findings down about both qualitative and quantitative extension/generalization of results ensured that your scholarly information was easily understood. I believe that your intended message was well received by all who read it. You obviously chose an excellent reference article. I feel that by preparing this assignment we will have a better, more in depth look into which approach to research will be more pertinent to our personal area of interest. I am a bit intimidated by preparing this project, but I know that the knowledge I acquire through each week’s lesson will improve my research abilities and add to my overall wisdom. I look forward to reading your posts in the future.

When recruiting participants for qualitative research, you can utilize a variety of sample strategies.
Purposeful and convenience sampling are the most popular sampling approaches because they work well with nearly all qualitative study designs.
Within a qualitative dissertation, sampling strategies can be utilized in conjunction with one another or on their own.
We’ll go over the two most popular strategies in further depth here.

Sampling with a Purpose:
Purposive sampling, also known as purposive and selected sampling, is a qualitative research technique that recruits participants who can provide in-depth and thorough information about the topic under inquiry.
It’s highly subjective, and it’s defined by the qualitative researcher who creates the qualifying criteria that each participant must meet in order to be included for the study.
A student who wants to investigate present nurses’ perspectives of leadership styles in a specific hospital setting is an example of this.
This one-sentence description can already create two selection criteria: (a) you must be a practicing nurse, and (b) you must work in a certain hospital setting.
Additional criteria, such as years in the field or nursing education level, will guarantee that participants have a similar background.

Convenience Sample: Qualitative researchers utilize this sampling strategy to acquire participants who are easily available and convenient to them.
This frequently entails employing a geographic location and resources that facilitate participant recruitment.
A teacher, for example, who wanted to investigate teachers’ reactions to a policy change decided to use a school in the district where he or she worked to recruit participants.
Another example would be a professional who is a member of a professional group and wished to recruit participants using the contact information available to members.
Both scenarios would be beneficial to each researcher, but they would necessitate securing permission to recruit subjects (from the district and professional organization respectively).

There are other sample procedures that qualitative researchers can employ, such as snowball and quota sampling, however the majority of qu