Review and study the PowerPoints posted in Blackboard.
Discussion Establishing Forecast Content Items
Review and study Chapter 14 in the textbook (Nowicki, 2018).
Review and study the PowerPoints posted in Blackboard.
Use critical thinking and metacognition when you read the Mini-Case Study (Nowicki, 2018, p. 321):
Suppose you are the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Memorial Hospital. Memorial is a nonprofit hospital with 300 beds and is located in a busy metropolitan area directly adjacent to a large university. Memorial is the only hospital within a 20-mile radius of campus, but construction on a new, competing hospital has just started within 5 miles.
Identify three forecast content items. How will they be measured?
What is the expected status of the content items in the future?
Which forecasting techniques should you use?
Assignment
• Review and study Chapter 14 in the textbook (Nowicki, 2018).
• Review and study the PowerPoints posted in Blackboard.
• Use critical thinking and metacognition when you read the Mini-Case Study (Nowicki, 2018, p. 321):
o Suppose you are the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Memorial Hospital. Memorial is a nonprofit hospital with 300 beds and is located in a busy metropolitan area directly adjacent to a large university. Memorial is the only hospital within a 20-mile radius of campus, but construction on a new, competing hospital has just started within 5 miles.
Identify three forecast content items. How will they be measured?
What is the expected status of the content items in the future?
Which forecasting techniques should you use?
• Write a 2-3-page paper in APA (2020) format, create a thesis statement relative to health financial management, and answer the research questions listed above in the Mini-Case Study. Include a cover page, a reference page, three peer-reviewed references, and use the textbook. The paper should follow the SESC format of state, explain, support, and conclude, see the Sample Paper.
• Review the Rubric to maximize points.
Name Individual Assignment 4 (30 Points) – Rubric
Description Health Financial Management, HSM 331-90
Module 6
Rubric Detail
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion Establishing Forecast Content Items
Criteria Levels of Achievement
Not Acceptable
Somewhat Acceptable
Acceptable
Highly Acceptable
Quality 0 Points
Work is not clearly connected to the required elements in the assignment. Thesis statement is not clear, logical and sets up the focus of the paper. The Research questions are not clearly stated and capture the full scope of the research effort.
6 Points
Work is somewhat connected to some of the required elements in the assignment. Thesis statement is somewhat clear, logical and sets up the focus of the paper. The Research questions are somewhat clearly stated and capture the full scope of the research effort.
8 Points
Work is connected to all the required elements in the assignment. Thesis statement is clear, logical and sets up the focus of the paper. The Research questions are clearly stated and capture the full scope of the research effort. 10 Points
Work is exceptional and the ideology was clearly connected to all the required elements in the assignment.
The elements of the Thesis Statement are clear, logical, and sets up the focus of the paper. The Research questions are clearly stated and capture the full scope of the research effort.
Critical Thinking 0 Points
Work did not successfully include coherence, clarity, and critical thinking skills. Metacognition is not clearly connected to the required elements. 6 Points
Work included some coherence, clarity, and critical thinking skills. Metacognition is somewhat connected to the required elements. 8 Points
Work included coherence, clarity, and critical thinking skills. Metacognition is connected to the required elements. 10 Points
Work exceeded expectations including coherence, clarity, and critical thinking skills. Metacognition is connected to the required elements.
Grammar and Spelling 0 Points
Work contained numerous grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 Points
Work contained some grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. 4 Points
Work is largely free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. 5 Points
Work is free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
References Used to Support Rationale 0 Points
Work did not include references or in-text citations, according to APA format. References are not peer-reviewed, and they are greater than 10 years old. 3 Points
Work somewhat included references or in-text citations, according to APA format and/or references are not peer-reviewed, and they are greater than 10 years old. 4 Points
Work included references or in-text citations according to APA format. References are peer-reviewed and are less than 10 years old. 5 Points
Work reflects stellar research efforts. Work shows in-text citations, according to APA format. References are peer-reviewed, they are less than 10 years old, and met the requirements.