Yoslaine The most effective level of engagement with the community is the level that sustains the community. The community must be sustained in order to have its best interest to be taken into consideration (Klauke et al., 2019). The nurse in their role can involve the community in sustaining because of wanting to come up with long-term outcomes, effectiveness in decision making, partnership, and procedures. The engagement level has a motive of creating a meaningful relationship and hence supporting each one in the community on matters of well-being, health, strength and also building on confidence is under these levels of engagement that a lot is done on concerning and recognizing the possible challenges and potential disparities that exist within the community (Truglio-Londrigan & Lewenson, 2017). The nurses will do their best to engage the community to address the disparities. For effective and perfect working, it is crucial that the nurse work with the community concerned as they are the basic part that guarantees the setting up of a sustainable community. This aspect calls for the nurses to integrate some groups for appraisal purposes and create other important relationships with the potential clients, consumers, and other organizations. Community participation is essential since it results in more positive results for the community. The ends of the community are likely to be satisfied by the organization as the community has a platform to discuss their challenges, desires, values, and beliefs, among others that must be addressed during decision making. Involving and engaging the community is the best and easier way to arrive at the right decision and makes the decision-making process easier. The community, on the other hand, feels that their challenges are being addressed and are being considered in decision-making (“Illustrative example of an engagement letter for a 401(k)-employee benefit plan audit engagement,” 2020). The engagement level sustains the community and helps increase trust and respect toward the decision, law, and policymakers. The individual in the community does have the most basic right to actively participate in speaking up on their concerns and their wants. An ineffective level of engagement is likely to discriminate and alienate and ultimately lose part of the society hence low quality or poor decisions. Florida Verona Historically, health promotion initiatives and activities were led by experts with no or no participation from the targeted community. Involving community people in public health treatments is a recent trend among public health professionals, policymakers, and academics. Community participation has been widely characterized as “engaging communities in decision- making as well as in the strategy, design, administration, and provision of products.” Community engagement operations may take various practices and are often defined in expressions of five degrees of participation: information-sharing, consultation, shared decision-making, moving together, and promoting autonomous community benefits. Community participation has been suggested as a hypothetically effective method for reducing health disparities. Notably, health disparities are related to changes in changeable health factors instead of fixed health determinants. Among the five levels of engagement, information-sharing, consultation, and shared decision-making are the most effective levels of engagement in nurses for communities. Nurses must create relationships and understand the issues affecting particular to provide the most appropriate resources and successful healthcare intervention. Previous evaluations of the evidence on community participation point to the possibility of social gains but ambiguous consequences on morbidity, mortality, and health disparities (O’Mara-Eves et al., 2019). Participatory engagement has been associated with favorable results for socially ostracized groups, including social capital and community cohesiveness, according to a review of international research conducted for the World Health Organization (O’Mara-Eves et al., 2019). Nevertheless, the author acknowledged that associations with well-being consequences are more challenging to establish. There is evidence for gains in societal capital, communal cohesiveness, and democracy as a consequence of community participation, but no evidence for benefits in mortality, disease, health habits, or the influence on disparities. No research directly tested the influence of community participation on outcomes, and assessments were often conducted too early in the intervention’s lifetime to reveal benefits (Campbell et al., 2019). Communities contribute to planning and assessment to work with the community in appraising challenges, formulating alternatives, and choosing preferred remedies. Improving community health demands the formation of collaborations and the use of partner assets. Partnership with relevant parties or partners who conduct collaborative community requirements evaluations has been associated with better public health outcomes (Cleary & Hunt, 2018). Determining how to involve community stakeholders, set joint objectives, and develop a shared vision may optimize community health improvement resources. By offering chances for young doctors to learn how community-level variables impact health outcomes before
persons are treated in acute care, concepts of preventative medicine are reaffirmed (Christens & Zeldin, 2019). When learners are engaged with community-based health institutes, they are provided an opportunity to integrate topics for which they may only have had conceptual knowledge, exercise cultural competency, and establish the framework for them to become health care professionals.