We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

, you will examine an ethical dilemma that exists in pediatric settings with a group of your peers.

, you will examine an ethical dilemma that exists in pediatric settings with a group of your peers.

Purpose

For this assignment, you will examine an ethical dilemma that exists in pediatric settings with a group of your peers. You will examine the ethical dilemma from two opposing positions and consider ethical principles, conflict between the principles and the relationship of the ANA Code of Ethics in relation to both positions. You will develop a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse). You will then present this information in class and engage in a debate format activity presenting arguments, grounded in scholarly sources, for both positions of your group’s dilemma.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Provides individualized comprehensive care for children and their families with multiple health problems in institutions and community care settings from birth through adolescence. (PO 1)

CO4: Utilizes critical thinking skills in clinical decision making in the care of pediatric clients. (PO 4)

CO6: Utilizes legal, ethical, and professional standards and principles, including those related to child abuse recognition and intervention, as a basis for pediatric clinical decision‐making. (PO 6)

CO8: Utilize research findings as a basis for nursing interventions in pediatric healthcare settings and the development of professional nursing papers. (PO 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

1. An ethical dilemma with opposing positions will be assigned by your instructor.

2. Although you may not agree with arguing one of the positions, reflect on your views, respect other perspectives, and examine scholarly literature on both positions.

3. Form a group of 5‐6 students.

· Your group must meet in person a minimum of one time with all members present.

4. Each student assumes an assigned role:

a. Moderator

· Introduces the dilemma and the team’s roles to the class. Asks the three (3) questions alternately to each position for debate. Present a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse). Fields questions from the class and moderates the debate. Presents concluding remarks after the debate.

b. Researcher (2)

· Perform preliminary research on the assigned ethical dilemma. Determines the ethical principles that apply to each position, possible conflicts in principles, and components of the ANA Code of Ethics that apply using three (3) Provisions. Disseminate information found to all group members.

c. Pro Debater

· In the debate activity, the pro debater argues for the “pro” side of the dilemma, and presents why this is the correct or most ethical position. Uses the applicable ethical principles, the ANA Code of Ethics, and scholarly source to support the position. Discusses possible outcomes of position being argued.

d. Con Debater

· In the debate activity, the con debater presents on the “con” side of the dilemma, and presents why this is the correct or most ethical position. Uses the applicable ethical principles, the ANA Code of Ethics, and scholarly source to support the position. Discusses possible outcomes of position being argued.

e. Recorder

· Prepares and submits the Power Point Presentation on behalf of the group. Assist with making notes for debaters and assists them during the debate as needed.

 

 

 

NR328 Pediatric Nursing

RUA: Ethical Dilemma Assignment Guidelines

 

 

NR328 Pediatric Nursing

RUA: Ethical Dilemma Assignment Guidelines

 

 

© 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR328_Ethical_Dilemma_Debate_Guidelines_V6_SPE21.docx 2

 

© 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR328 Ethical Dilemma Guidelines V6_SPE21.docx 1

 

5. Make a case for both positions and possible outcomes by formulating three (3) questions the moderator will ask each side, focusing on the ANA Code of Ethics to support the nurse’s perspective as caring for the patient.

6. Practice as a group how you will debate this issue, with your moderator serving as the leader.

7. Make notes for your reference during the debate and be prepared to defend your positions based on your research.

8. The debate will last no more than 15 minutes.

9. Use this link to take you directly to the ANA website to access the Code of Ethics. When prompted, choose “No I do not wish to register at this time. Take me to the Code now.” https://www.nursingworld.org/practice‐policy/nursing‐ excellence/ethics/code‐of‐ethics‐for‐nurses/

10. For APA, formatting, or grammar assistance visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online library.

11. Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the Grading Rubric):

a. Professionalism ‐5 points/5%

· Team members are professionally dressed.

· Team is introduced and assigned roles are identified prior to starting the debate.

· Full group participation.

· Respectful and professional language is used throughout the debate.

· Adhere to the time limit of 15 minutes for the debate.

b. Debate ‐50 points/50%

· The opposing positions debated are made clear.

· Argue the issue from a Pro position crediting a supporting scholarly source.

· Argue the issue from a Con position crediting a supporting scholarly source.

· Present arguments in a clear and articulate manner.

· Use appropriate ethical principle(s) to support each position.

· Consider which, if any, ethical principles are in conflict with the opposing positions.

· Use three (3) provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics that apply to the ethical dilemma.

· Discuss possible outcomes of each position being argued.

· Present a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse).

c. Post‐Debate Discussion ‐ 15 points/15%

· Elicit questions from the class after the debate.

· Respond professionally and appropriately to questions from the class and faculty.

· Include concluding remarks by moderator.

d. PowerPoint ‐ 20 points/20%

· Title page

· Brief description of the assigned case

· Ethical dilemma the case presents

· Ethical principles that relate to the case

· Three (3) provisions from the ANA code of Ethics that apply to the case

· Possible outcomes

· Plan for resolving the dilemma

· At least 2 sources used to support work

· Reference page

· 10‐12 slides (Do not exceed 12 slides)

e. APA Style and Organization ‐ 10 points/10%

· References are submitted with assignment.

· Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

· Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

· At least three (3) scholarly, peer reviewed, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

· One (1) scholarly source must be the ANA Code of Ethics and each position must be supported by a scholarly source.

 

Grading Rubric

Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present
Professionalism

(5 points/5%)

5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 0 points
Required criteria

1. Team members are professionally dressed.

2. Team is introduced and assigned roles are identified prior to starting the debate.

3. Full group participation.

4. Respectful and professional language is used throughout the debate.

5. Adhere to the time limit of 15 minutes for the debate.

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. Includes no less than 3 requirement for section. Includes no less than 2 requirement for section. Includes 1 or no requirements for section.
Debate

(50 points/50%)

50 points 40 points 30 points 20 points 0 points
Required criteria

1. The opposing positions debated are made clear.

2. Argue the issue from a Pro position crediting a supporting scholarly source.

3. Argue the issue from a Con position crediting a supporting scholarly source.

4. Present arguments in a clear and articulate manner.

5. Use appropriate ethical principle(s) to support each position.

6. Consider which, if any, ethical principles are in conflict with the opposing positions.

7. Use three (3) provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics that apply to the ethical dilemma.

8. Discuss possible outcomes of each position being argued.

9. Present a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse).

Includes no fewer than 9 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 8 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 7 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 or fewer requirements for section.

 

NR328 Pediatric Nursing

RUA: Ethical Dilemma Assignment Guidelines

 

 

© 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved

NR328_Ethical_Dilemma_Debate_Guidelines_V6_SEP21.docx 1

 

 

Post-Debate Discussion

(15 points/15%)

15 points 7 points 5 points 0 points
Required criteria

1. Elicit questions from the class after the debate.

2. Respond professionally and appropriately to questions from the class and faculty.

3. Include concluding remarks by moderator.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. Includes no less than 2 requirements for section. Includes no less than

1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.
PowerPoint

(20 points/20%)

20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points 0 points
Required criteria

1. Title page

2. Brief description of the assigned case

3. Ethical dilemma the case presents

4. Ethical principles that relate to the case

5. Three (3) provisions from the ANA code of Ethics that apply to the case

6. Possible outcomes

7. Plan for resolving the dilemma

8. At least 2 sources used to support work

9. Reference page

10. 10‐12 slides (Do not exceed 12 slides)

Includes no fewer than 10 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 9 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 8 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 7 requirements for section. Includes 6 or fewer requirements for section.
APA Style and Organization

(10 points/10%)

10 points 8 points 6 points 4 points 0 points
Required criteria

1. References are submitted with assignment.

2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

4. At least three (3) scholarly, nursing, peer reviewed, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided

5. One (1) scholarly source must be the ANA Code of Ethics Provisions and each position must be supported by a scholarly source.

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. Includes 1 or no requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 100

Our Service Charter
________________________________________
1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Experts .org only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.
2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.
3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Experts .org are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.
4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Experts .org is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.
5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Nursing Experts .org, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Prices
  • Guarantees
  • Contact Us
 
Free resources
 
  • Free Essays
  • Essay tips
  • Essay types
  • Plagiarism Checker
 
Dissertation help
 
  • Free consultation
  • Essay examples
  • Buy essay
  • Dissertation assistance
  • Free dissertations
  • Coursework help
 
nursingexperts.org  ©2017- 2021  All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy